Scientific Abstract Critique
Critique a scientific abstract with a DeepSeek reasoning stage and an OpenAI response.
Demonstrates DeepSeek-backed reasoning for methodology critique.
DeepSeek retired the deepseek-reasoner alias after July 24, 2026. Before running this archived example, replace DeepSeek(id="deepseek-reasoner") with DeepSeek(id="deepseek-v4-flash") in the saved program. The main OpenAI model remains a separate call, so both provider keys are required. See the DeepSeek V4 migration notice.
"""
Scientific Abstract Critique
============================
Demonstrates DeepSeek-backed reasoning for methodology critique.
"""
from agno.agent import Agent
from agno.models.deepseek import DeepSeek
from agno.models.openai import OpenAIResponses
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Create Agent
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
task = (
"Read the following abstract of a scientific paper and provide a critical evaluation of its methodology,"
"results, conclusions, and any potential biases or flaws:\n\n"
"Abstract: This study examines the effect of a new teaching method on student performance in mathematics. "
"A sample of 30 students was selected from a single school and taught using the new method over one semester. "
"The results showed a 15% increase in test scores compared to the previous semester. "
"The study concludes that the new teaching method is effective in improving mathematical performance among high school students."
)
agent = Agent(
model=OpenAIResponses(id="gpt-5.6"),
reasoning_model=DeepSeek(id="deepseek-reasoner"),
markdown=True,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Run Agent
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
if __name__ == "__main__":
agent.print_response(task, stream=True, show_full_reasoning=True)An explicit reasoning_model runs as a separate, tool-free reasoning stage before the main model response. show_full_reasoning=True displays the reasoning data Agno receives; it cannot reveal a provider's private internal trace. Some adapters use the reasoning stage's answer text when separate reasoning content is unavailable. A failed reasoning stage can still be followed by a main-model answer, so a completed run alone does not prove the reasoning stage succeeded.
Run the Example
Set up your virtual environment
uv venv --python 3.12
source .venv/bin/activateInstall dependencies
uv pip install -U agno openaiExport your API keys
export DEEPSEEK_API_KEY="your_deepseek_api_key_here"
export OPENAI_API_KEY="your_openai_api_key_here"Run the example
Save the code above as scientific_research.py, then run:
python scientific_research.pyFull source: cookbook/10_reasoning/agents/scientific_research.py